Obama Control

Obama is ignoring constitutional separation of powers to implement gun control measures. By doing so he’s fundamentally transforming the American regime into a progressive dictatorship in which he can remove your natural law right to protect yourself and your family by himself, without Congress. — Mark Levin

Chris Pandolfo is a fellow at Conservative Review (CR), writer for the CR Wire, and works for CR editor Mark Levin. But like most of us, Chris is also a big fan of The Great One, noted radio talk show host Mark Levin. Share his work:

Levin: We Need Obama Control!

Back from his holiday vacation, Conservative Review Editor-in-Chief Mark Levin took to the airwaves Monday night to lay out exactly what’s at stake with President Obama’s executive action on gun control.

Levin argues that, by ignoring the separation of powers in the constitution to implement gun control measures, President Obama is fundamentally transforming the American regime into a progressive dictatorship in which he can remove your natural law right to protect yourself and your family by himself, without Congress.

The Founders separated the powers of government into three co-equal branches in the constitution to prevent this and ensure that one branch of government would be kept in check by the others. Levin argues that the American Constitution was specifically designed to prevent someone like President Obama from taking away your liberties.

Listen to Mark Levin on SoundCloud.

The constitution empowers the Republican-controlled Congress with the power of the purse to stop President Obama. But Republican leadership has long since surrendered that power.

Without the right of self-defense, humans have no rights at all.

We don’t need or want anyone’s permission to arm and defend ourselves. We don’t need a law — or in this case a fascist’s diktat — to tell us it’s right or wrong. Those are our primal freedoms, they come before and above any arbitrary man-made law.

It is the truth that matters. Be thankful there is a Second Amendment, not for our liberty, but to define the limits of those who think they have some special right to rule over us and our liberty. And that specifically applies to presidents.

God Preserve the United States of America.

Share

Executive Shenanigans, Again

More executive action by the Obama social fascist regime will be part of a new year push — to make progress on a long-stalled attack on American firearms freedom before the 2016 election heats up.

o-smug.jpg

The Obama regime wants the second-most (many believe most) important of every United States citizen’s Bill of Rights erased, or at least made irrelevant. What’s worse, there is an institutional hostility throughout America’s enabling media toward gun owners.

I know, I know, progressive regimes always try to disarm the people. It’s what social fascists do. Still, it’s hard to believe that in a nation of more than 100 million gun owners, Obama and his minions will not stop until you can no longer defend yourself, your family, or your property from… anyone.

Read more

Share

I’m 63 and I’m Tired

I know, I know, another email… My brother-in-law emailed the following letter to me about the destruction of America and her allies by the Obama regime. It doesn’t matter if it’s email fodder or not when it’s true — and this should be required reading for every man, woman, and child in the English-speaking world.

anger.jpg

The following text is attributed to U.S. Marine Corps veteran and former Massachusetts state senator Robert A. Hall. A few years ago, he condemned the ideas and policies of Obama and the "Latte Liberals" who voted for him (even the leftist Snopes authenticated):

I’m 63. Except for one semester in college when jobs were scarce and a six-month period when I was between jobs, but job-hunting every day, I’ve worked, hard, since I was 18. Despite some health challenges, I still put in 50-hour weeks, and haven’t called in sick in seven or eight years. I make a good salary, but I didn’t inherit my job or my income, and I worked to get where I am. Given the economy, there’s no retirement in sight, and I’m tired. Very tired.

I’m tired of being told that I have to "spread the wealth" to people who don’t have my work ethic. I’m tired of being told the government will take the money I earned, by force if necessary, and give it to people too lazy to earn it.

I’m tired of being told that I have to pay more taxes to “keep people in their homes.” Sure, if they lost their jobs or got sick, I’m willing to help. But if they bought McMansions at three times the price of our paid-off, $250,000 condo, on one-third of my salary, then let the left-wing Congress-critters who passed Fannie and Freddie and the Community Reinvestment Act that created the bubble help them with their own money.

Read more

Share

Netanyahu

Can there be any greater insult toward a loyal ally than that which the Obama regime brought about this week? Netanyahu is still sounding the alarm. Obama is still refusing to listen.

netanyahu.jpg

It isn’t bad enough that Obama and many of his Executive Branch minions boycotted Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Tuesday speech before a joint session of Congress. Worse, even some of his leftist cohort in Congress, including a former anti-constitutional Speaker of the House, chose to act in a reprehensible and irresponsible manner.

Why did Prime Minister Netanyahu — after six years of the Obama regime’s "less than cordial" actions toward Israel — tolerate insult and bear leftist scorn? In a word, Iran. For Obama, a deal with Iran is the pinnacle of some nebulous plan whose rationale and endgame only he and a select few ideologues can possibly understand. New York Times best-selling author Joel C. Rosenberg sheds some light on Netanyahu’s reasoning and punches holes in the wrong-headed notions of America’s current sociofascist regime.

Read more

Share

Lie After Abysmal Lie

If Obama’s "recovery" actually existed as did the previous ten post-war recoveries, 14 million more Americans would be working today and the average real per capita income of every man, woman, and child in America would be $6,308 higher. It doesn’t. He’s lying – again.

liar.jpg

For years now, Americans have been misled, duped, and flat-out lied to about the indescribable economic miracle for which the Obama regime has been heroically struggling. Why, just last month Obama and his minions again assured us that Obama’s economic recovery was "robust" and all was rosy. After all, isn’t success Obama’s purposeful political strategy?

Er… in a word, no. This mystifying, media-driven windbaggery has been eloquently deflated by Rush Limbaugh: "Obama’s purposeful political strategy, perfectly executed, is to be seen on the golf course. And on vacation. And seemingly disengaged from the traditional duties and schedules of the presidency." Rush nailed it. If your minions carry out your commands whilst you’re able to remain aloof and distant from the resulting carnage, you have succeeded. And as a bonus, the awful truth about his lies and regime lawlessness have been slavishly supported by the leftist media who helped elect him — twice.

Fast and Furious, amnesty, Obamacare, stimulus, crony capitalism, Iraq, Benghazi, Libya, undefended border, taxes, wealth redistribution, racial tension, Egypt, etc., etc., etc. Lie after lie, deception after deception. Obama may be the best you’ve ever experienced at hiding his anti-Americanism. Take time to read about just how deeply Obama has gone down the deceit rabbit hole:

DC Establishment: Practicing THE ART OF DECEPTION

by Rush Limbaugh

"Obama, Outraged Over Beheading, Vows to Stay on Course." — headline, The New York Times, 8/20/14

This was one vow Obama kept. Five minutes after his "outraged" statement about the ISIS terror murder of American journalist James Foley, Obama stayed on course, all right. The golf course. In Martha’s Vineyard. (In solidarity with the global poor and oppressed.) After internet-wide ridicule for their "unfortunate" headline, The Times quietly reworded it: "Obama, ‘Appalled’ by Beheading, Will Continue Airstrikes."

They were right the first time.

Obama’s purposeful political strategy, perfectly executed, is to be seen on the golf course. And on vacation. And seemingly disengaged from the traditional duties and schedules of the Presidency. Here, just a smattering of headlines:

  • "Why Is Obama Disconnected, Directionless?" — CNBC
  • "Barack Obama Has Already Checked Out of His Job." — The [UK]Telegraph
  • "The Insiders: Is Obama Acting Like a Former President?" — The Washington Post
  • "The Obama Doctrine: Inarticulate or Disengaged?" — CNN

How many stories like this have you seen? A lot: "Obama doesn’t like the job anymore, he doesn’t care, he plays golf all the time, he’s bored." I’ve got a theory: this is exactly what he wants everyone to think. Why does Obama go on so many vacations? To get the headlines he’s getting, to make it appear as if he’s detached, disconnected, directionless.

It’s a con game. I’m convinced he takes so many vacations to further this notion that he doesn’t know what’s going on, he doesn’t care, he is not responsible. The truth is, B. Hussein O. is responsible for every smidgeon of what’s happening. All this apparent lack of focus is misdirection — aimed at the elimination of any opposition. By that I mean the wiping out of the Republican Party as a functioning threat or check to his power. That is the objective.

And this isn’t unique to Barack Obama. Elimination of all opposition is characteristic of statists. They are power-mad control freaks, who brook no opposition. Leftists are singularly alike, and they have singular objectives. From Stalin to Mao to Fidel to the unions to the university to the media to the research-grant complex to the Democrat Party and every left-run institution in the world, the left does not tolerate dissent.

Obama wants the way cleared for him. So I’m convinced that all his vacations and all the stories about his being bored and detached and disconnected are to disguise how tightly he controls all of it. It is a well-conceived, brilliantly executed strategy that’s kept his fingerprints off all of the crap happening in this country for six years.

The golfing-bored-Obama is a corollary of the Limbaugh Theorem: he doesn’t appear to have anything to do with events. He’s always out campaigning against what he’s unleashed, in fact. He’s against what’s happening in the job market. Opposed to what’s happening with the banks and Big Business and cronyism. He’s mad about what happened in Benghazi. He’s living the high life, decrying "the rich" in every speech. And what impression is created? He’s got nothing to do with it. Poor guy is just buffeted by events.

I’m telling you, that’s not who he is. This is a hands-on, steer-the-ship individual. Yet, amazingly, he’s got everyone believing that he’s "checked out." It’s masterful PR, buzz, show, optics, image.

Look at health care: "You can keep your doctor; you can keep your plan." No, you can’t. "Sign up at HealthCare.gov." No, it’s an absolute disaster. Look at the economy. Look at the efforts to silence the Tea Party using the IRS. Look at the character assassination of Republican Presidential nominees. Several of them have on their resumes either criminal investigations, or now with Rick Perry, a criminal indictment.

Somehow, Barack Obama is not linked to any of this. "I learned about that when I read the paper." Oh, please. That repeated line of obvious BS is prima facie evidence of my point, that the strategy here is to portray Obama as aloof, disinterested, not engaged, not caring, tired of the job, bored, doesn’t care anymore, is phoning it in.

Nothing could be further from the truth. Obama’s got two full years, and in his mind, his Regime has only just begun.

Obama is pulling every string, directing every movement of his Administration. He is firmly in control, leading from behind the scenes. Obama is calling all the shots while everybody thinks he’s playing golf. That’s how he gets away with it, folks: by convincing people he doesn’t even care. Please do not doubt me.

Meanwhile, the Republicans have no idea what they’re dealing with. Barack Obama is on a mission to obliterate them. So he can continue his long march, unopposed, through the traditions and institutions that made America great — in order to fundamentally transform them into something pitiful and unrecognizable. He envisions standing somewhere — I don’t know, maybe in Chicago, or Detroit, or Ferguson, MO — in front of his "Mission Accomplished" banner, having once and for all eliminated the Republican Party as an effective opposing force.

For Obama’s purposes, the fastest way to get there is amnesty, which the GOP establishment long ago embraced. The big-money Chamber of Commerce is demanding that Republicans enact amnesty, according to Politico, with Commerce president Tom Donohue declaring: "If the Republicans don’t do it, they shouldn’t bother to run a candidate in 2016."

Amnesty would, by itself, be sufficient to give the Democrats control of virtually all the levers of U.S. power for a generation. In essence, amnesty would be a political (not military) coup d’état, eliminating the Republican Party as a national force. But the great Washington trick has been convincing establishment Republicans that amnesty, the very thing that will annihilate them, is actually the answer to all their problems.

Sen. John McCain recites the tired establishment line, as quoted by Time: "If we don’t enact some kind of comprehensive immigration reform, I do not see a way for us to really win a general election." All the establishment hacks say this, with zip, zero, nada evidence.

With amnesty, Obama plants five million, six million, perhaps up to 12 million new Democrat voters, with the stroke of his pen. Who then become the leverage, so to speak, to add exponentially millions more Democrat imported voters. Ideally, Obama would love to have the Republicans make this happen — and thus issue the Republican Party death blow themselves. That would be Christmas morning for him.

But thanks to pressure from you, and thanks to the hard work of stalwart members of Congress, including Sen. Jeff Sessions (see pp. 6-10), it appears as if the establishment amnesty crowd has been pushed back. (Again!) Which is why we are now getting headlines like these: "Behind Closed Doors, Obama Crafts Executive Actions" (The New York Times), and: "The Politics of Executive Action on Immigration" (MSNBC). Obama may not be able to manipulate the GOP into suicide-by-amnesty at the moment, but GOP death is fine any way he can get it.

After all, amnesty is crucial to his objective of transforming America. Remember, Obama’s goal is not to transform the Democrat Party. His goal is to transform the country. And if there is a blanket amnesty, then we essentially have a one-Party country. No matter what the Republicans do, they will not be able to compete with the imported – Democrat – voter numbers.

And the amnesty machinery is still churning deep in the bowels of the gop establishment. Politico reports: "Many prominent Republicans, from House Speaker John Boehner to billionaire super-donor Sheldon Adelson, still support immigration reform…" And The New York Times helpfully advises, "It’s Not Too Late for Republicans to Win Latino Votes." (Translation: Pleeeeese still do amnesty!)

But why was the House working on immigration legislation that was dead-on-arrival in the Senate, and would have been vetoed by Obama anyway? The harsh answer: Because the House Republican leadership is practicing the art of deception — on a very narrow trip-wire.

The Establishment wants amnesty, but they don’t want the public blame. They want their pro-amnesty donors to perceive that they worked hard to make amnesty happen. They authored legislation that would have given the big donors what they wanted: amnesty. Their plan was to pass a bill that didn’t have a prayer, so they could tell their donors: "See, we tried." They would say basically the same thing to Hispanic voters: "We do love you. Look what we tried to do."

The deceit goes even farther: The agenda all along was that Obama would ultimately use his executive actions. That way Republicans get what they want, what their donors want — amnesty — and they get to claim it’s all Obama’s fault. They’ve got to try to convince you that they don’t want Obama getting away with it. They want to persuade their donors that they’re trying to make amnesty happen, while they try to con you into believing they’re trying to stop Obama from enacting amnesty. Bottom line: the gop leadership supports amnesty, while they’re trying to figure out how to pretend they don’t.

What a shell game! This is what happens when a Party won’t stand for anything, and refuses to push back on principle. None of this saves the country, or prevents Obama from "transforming" it. None of it makes sense if you view Republicans as the opposition. It only makes sense if you see the gop establishment and donors as essentially on the same page as Obama.

It’s all going to backfire on this corrupt D.C. establishment alliance. I don’t think they’ve got the slightest idea what’s about to come down on them in November. While they continue to plot their deceptions, they cannot fathom how many millions of Americans resent the hell out of what they’re doing. But they’re about to find out.

It is hard for any of us to conceive how difficult our world situation is today, and it should not have happened this way. A lot of the things we are suffering through now, both domestically and internationally, should never, ever have happened. All that was needed was a president who cherished the Republic and its laws, and a sense of duty to provide firm, clear leadership from the White House. That we have been subjected to the opposite is heartbreaking — remember in November.

God Preserve the United States of America.

Share